The collapse of Swiss bank secrecy, the IRS
settlement with UBS, the criminal investigation of HSBC and the related IRS
voluntary disclosure program all have put foreign bank accounts in the
spotlight. Tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of U.S. taxpayers
have foreign bank accounts. Some of those taxpayers opened their foreign bank
account in order to hide money or the earnings in the account from the
IRS.
However, the majority of taxpayers with foreign bank accounts never intended to hide their foreign accounts from the IRS. Some just inherited the foreign account from a relative who lived abroad at some point in their lives. Other taxpayers lived abroad themselves and opened a bank account in a foreign country as a matter of convenience or necessity. Still other U.S. taxpayers with foreign accounts never even lived in the United States but are U.S. citizens, and therefore are subject to U.S. reporting requirements, simply because one or both of their parents were U.S. citizens.
However, the majority of taxpayers with foreign bank accounts never intended to hide their foreign accounts from the IRS. Some just inherited the foreign account from a relative who lived abroad at some point in their lives. Other taxpayers lived abroad themselves and opened a bank account in a foreign country as a matter of convenience or necessity. Still other U.S. taxpayers with foreign accounts never even lived in the United States but are U.S. citizens, and therefore are subject to U.S. reporting requirements, simply because one or both of their parents were U.S. citizens.
Regardless of why the foreign account was created or
acquired, any U.S. person with an interest in, or signatory authority over, a
foreign financial account must file a Report of Foreign Bank Accounts (FBAR)
with the United States Treasury Department. The IRS recently has stepped up
enforcement against taxpayers who fail to file FBARs. The basic penalty for a
simple, non-willful failure to file a FBAR is $10,000 per year for 2005 and
later years. (Prior to 2005, there was no penalty at all for non-willful
violations.) However, if the IRS can prove that the taxpayer willfully failed to
file a FBAR, or willfully filed a false FBAR, the penalties are much higher. The
taxpayer can be subject to criminal prosecution and, for 2005 and later years,
the IRS can impose crippling civil penalties of up to 50% of the highest balance
in the foreign account for each year that the violation continues. (Prior to
2005, the penalty for a willful violation was capped at $100,000 per
year.)
If the IRS catches a taxpayer who failed to file a
FBAR, the IRS will either refer the case for prosecution or attempt to assert a
penalty based on some percentage of the highest balance in the foreign account.
In fact, even taxpayers who approach the IRS and voluntarily disclose the
existence of their foreign account will be charged a penalty based on a
percentage of the highest balance in the foreign account. Taxpayers who
voluntarily disclosed their foreign account prior to October 15, 2009 are being
charged a 20% penalty. Taxpayers who make a voluntary disclosure after October
15, 2009 are still being accepted into the voluntary disclosure program, but
they will be charged a penalty of at least 20%, and probably more, of the
highest balance in the foreign account.
Any penalty that is based on a percentage of the
balance in the foreign account is premised on the idea that the FBAR violation
was willful, and therefore, the IRS could take up to 50% of the balance in the
account for each year of the violation. However, if the FBAR violation was not
willful, then the penalty would be limited to $10,000 per year, and it would not
be possible to charge a penalty based on a percentage of the balance in the
account. Even taxpayers who have entered the voluntary disclosure program can
opt out of the program and contest the willfulness penalty that is imposed as
part of the program. Thus, when advising a client regarding his or her exposure
to FBAR penalties, it is essential to determine whether the failure to file the
FBAR was willful.
Willfulness is defined as "an intentional violation
of a known legal duty." The government has the burden of proving willfulness. To
prove willfulness, the government must establish that (1) the taxpayer was
required to file a FBAR; (2) the taxpayer knew that he or she had to file a
FBAR; and (3) the taxpayer intentionally failed to file, or falsely filed, the
FBAR. It is very difficult for the government to prove that a taxpayer knew that
he or she had to file a FBAR. This is particularly so, given the complete lack
of FBAR enforcement over the past 30 years. Very few taxpayers and tax return
preparers had ever heard of a FBAR until recently. Indeed, most IRS agents
themselves were completely unaware of the FBAR filing requirements until a few
years ago when FBARs began to receive more attention from the
IRS.
So, how does the IRS go about proving that a
taxpayer knew that he or she had to file a FBAR? The Internal Revenue Manual
identifies several types of evidence that could support an inference that a
taxpayer knew of the requirement to file a FBAR yet nevertheless failed to file
it. Such evidence includes, but is not limited to, (1) failure to report income
from the foreign bank account on the taxpayer's tax return; (2) failure to check
the box on Schedule B asking whether the taxpayer has a foreign account, or
falsely checking the box "No"; (3) discussions between the taxpayer and an
accountant regarding the foreign bank account; and (4) false statements to an
IRS agent who inquires about the existence of a foreign bank
account.
Many IRS agents believe any taxpayer who failed to
report income from a foreign account and failed to disclose the account in
response to the question on Schedule B is a tax cheat and liar who must have
known about the FBAR filing requirements yet intentionally failed to comply.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
As described above, many taxpayers created or
inherited a foreign account for completely legitimate, non-tax-related reasons
and believed that income earned in a foreign country is not reportable in the
United States until it's brought into the country. The tax code is so
complicated and riddled with exceptions regarding the reporting of off-shore
earnings that such a belief is very understandable. Further, Form 1040 is
sufficiently complex that many taxpayers simply signed their tax returns without
reviewing every line, including the line at the bottom of Schedule B asking
whether the taxpayer had a foreign bank account. Most accountants never
discussed this aspect of the return with their clients and simply checked the
box "no," or left it blank, with no further inquiry.
Our ex IRS agent who was a manager in the
international division of the IRS suggests you file and then opt out to reduce
taxes.
FBAR/OVDI LANCE WALLACH
ReplyDeleteFBAR Foreign Bank Account Reporting The IRS is assessing huge penalties for undisclosed foreign bank accounts, assets & income. Click for more info FBAR FILING DEADLING HAS BEEN EXTENDED
Tuesday, December 24, 2013
FBAR Offshore Bank Accounts and Foreign Income Attacked by IRS
FBAR Offshore Bank Accounts and Foreign Income Attacked by IRS
Posted by Lance Wallach at 9:19 AM
Email This
BlogThis!
Share to Twitter
Share to Facebook
Share to Pinterest
Labels: FBAR, Foreign Income, IRS, Lance Wallach, Lance Wallach Expert Witness
1 comment:
Lance WallachMarch 7, 2014 at 10:49 AM
FBAR/OVDI LANCE WALLACH
FBAR Foreign Bank Account Reporting The IRS is assessing huge penalties for undisclosed foreign bank accounts, assets & income. Click for more info FBAR FILING DEADLING HAS BEEN EXTENDED
Tuesday, November 5, 2013
FBAR Offshore Bank Accounts and Foreign Income Attacked by IRS. Lance Wallach, expert witness.
You may want to think about participation in the IRS’ offshore tax amnesty program (called the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative). Do you want to play audit roulette with the IRS? Some clients think they are too small to be prosecuted. They are wrong.
To the average businessperson, only the guys with tens of millions secretly stashed in Swiss bank accounts get prosecuted. Don't tell that to Michael Schiavo. He was just prosecuted for hiding money in a Swiss account back in 2003. How much money does the IRS say he hid? A whopping $90,000. That’s it.
But wait, there is more to the story. Schiavo attempted to do a quiet disclosure during the 2009 amnesty but instead of filling out the amnesty paperwork, he simply trusted that by coming forward voluntarily he could avoid criminal prosecution. He was wrong on all counts. Nothing is too small for the IRS, and nothing is too old.
“So, to save a whopping $40,624 in taxes, this guy risked a felony conviction and prison time, not to mention steep penalties that could very easily eat up the entire $90,000, and also his criminal and civil defense costs.
The smart taxpayers are the ones coming forward and not having to look over their shoulders for the next 10 years.
Time is running out. The tax amnesty runs through August but it takes at least days to jump through all the hoops. We will also fight hard to reduce the penalties down even more. Remember, the IRS can go as low as 5%.
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
ReplyDeleteThe IRS has kicked out an undisclosed number of taxpayers from the OVDI program this week
Lance Wallach
We have written at least 75 posts about the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (called OVDI or OVDP) and the need to file FBARs (Reports of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts). In almost every such post we remind readers that time is running out. Many folks learned this week just how true that advice was.
The IRS has kicked out an undisclosed number of taxpayers from the OVDI program this week, even though they had previously received acceptance letters. Why? Because their names had already been disclosed to the IRS from a cooperating bank. The decision to begin enforcing the “first contact policy” has tremendous impacts on the millions of Americans with unreported foreign accounts.
Officially, anyone can participate in the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program unless they are under audit or criminal investigation, have received notice from the IRS regarding unreported foreign accounts or the IRS has already received their name from a cooperating bank. The first two exceptions are easy to understand = if you get a notice in the mail or a knock on the door from the IRS its too late to seek amnesty protection.
No one knows how or when the IRS will receive information from a cooperating bank. In some instances, the information could literally sit for months somewhere within the giant IRS bureaucracy until contact is made. That is exactly what has happened with last week’s recision letters sent by the IRS.
An undisclosed number of taxpayers who were already accepted into the program received letters from the IRS advising them that they were no longer eligible. Their participation was terminated meaning that they are now subject to audit, possible criminal prosecution and draconian penalties. Some had been in the program for 6 months before receiving the fateful letters.
Obviously, tax records are confidential and the IRS won’t share the names of those folks who have been rejected from the program. From what we can gather from the small community of lawyers that specialize in offshore tax reporting, most of those rejected had accounts at Bank Leumi. Coincidentally, Bank Leumi has been under investigation by the IRS and Justice Department for quite some time. This means that as part of the investigation, at some point Bank Leumi turned over the names of U.S. account holders rendering those people instantly ineligible for the amnesty program.
Is the IRS playing fair? Absolutely not but they are playing within the rules. Rules that they made.
We believe that once accepted into the program, participants should be allowed to complete the program and reap the benefits of compliance. The stated mission of the IRS is to promote voluntary compliance with the tax code. Pulling the rug out from under folks who made a good faith decision to come into compliance isn’t exactly fair. The IRS did reserve the right to reject anyone, however, if their name and identity had already been disclosed.
Lance Wallach | Facebook
ReplyDeletehttps://www.facebook.com/lance.wallach
Lance Wallach is on Facebook. Join Facebook to connect with Lance Wallach and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to share and makes ...
Lance Wallach shared this on Google+
WeFiveKings: Calling Out Lance Wallach
wefivekingsblog.blogspot.com/2010/11/calling-out-lance-wallach.html
Nov 16, 2010 - Consider, for example, this article by Lance Wallach titled "The dangers of being 'listed'". The article is clearly designed to be alarming.
Lance Wallach shared this on Google+
Amazon.com: Lance Wallach: Books, Biography, Blog, Audiobooks ...
www.amazon.com/Lance-Wallach/e/B002PCF57E
Amazon.com
Visit Amazon.com's Lance Wallach Page and shop for all Lance Wallach books and other Lance Wallach related products (DVD, CDs, Apparel). Check out ...
IRS Secrets You Should Know by Lance Wallach - YouTube
► 0:54► 0:54
www.youtube.com/watch?v...
YouTube
May 18, 2012 - Uploaded by Lance Wallach
Get IRS Secrets You Should Know here: http://www.tinyurl.com/LWIRSBook My name is Lance Wallach and I ...
More by Lance Wallach - in 56 Google+ circles
Lance Wallach - YouTube
www.youtube.com/user/LanceWallach
by Lance Wallach - in 56 Google+ circles
Lance Wallach. Videos · Playlists ... Lance Wallach -Tax Resolution Expert, Now Available for Consultation! ... Lance Wallach -
412i-419 Plans
ReplyDelete419 & 412i benefit plan,abusive tax shelters, Lance Wallach Expert Witness
Friday, March 7, 2014
FBAR/OVDI LANCE WALLACH: IRS FBAR Voluntary Disclosure Initiative, opt out ...
FBAR/OVDI LANCE WALLACH: IRS FBAR Voluntary Disclosure Initiative, opt out ...: Lance Wallach The 2012 OVDI, which is still open, is patterned after the 2011 OVDI, but increases the maximum Report of Foreign Ban...
Search Results
ReplyDeleteCaptive Insurance & 419 Plans Litigation
lancewallachchfc.blogspot.com/
by Lance Wallach - in 57 Google+ circles
Mar 12, 2014 - Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent ...
You shared this on Google+
Lance Wallach - The Nation's Foremost 419 and 412i plans expert
www.lancewallach.com/
Lance Wallach is the nation's foremost expert on 419 plans,412i plans,listed transactions,reportable transactions,Section 79 plans, captive insurance plans, ...
Lance Wallach shared this on Google+
Lance Wallach | LinkedIn
www.linkedin.com/in/lancewallach
Greater New York City Area - director at taxaudit419.com
View Lance Wallach's professional profile on LinkedIn. LinkedIn is the world's largest business network, helping professionals like Lance Wallach discover ...
You've visited this page 3 times. Last visit: 3/10/14
Lance Wallach | Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/lance.wallach
Lance Wallach is on Facebook. Join Facebook to connect with Lance Wallach and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to share and makes ...
Lance Wallach shared this on Google+
Lance Wallach (LanceWallach) on Twitter
https://twitter.com/LanceWallach
The latest from Lance Wallach (@LanceWallach). Defending businesses & financial professionals from IRS audits, insurance & brokerage firms. 419 & 412 Plan ...
Lance Wallach shared this on Google+
CJA & Associates and 412i, 419, and Other Abusive Plans
wewanttoprofileyouinnewbook.blogspot.com/.../cja-associates-and-412i-...
by Lance Wallach - in 57 Google+ circles
Nov 27, 2012 - Lance Wallach is the leading expert on 412i,
IRS Secrets You Should Know by Lance Wallach
ReplyDelete412i 419E IRS Audits and Problems
ReplyDelete412i, 419e plans litigation and IRS Audit Experts for abusive insurance based plans deemed reportable or listed transactions by the IRS.
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
412(I) Plans and and the IRS audits and lawsuits.
Lance Wallach
412(i) is a provision of the tax code. A 412(i) plan is a defined pension plan. A 412(i) plan differs from other defined benefit pension plans in that it must be funded exclusively by the purchase of individual insurance products (insurance and annuities). It provides specific retirement benefits to participants once they reach retirement and must contain assets sufficient to pay those benefits. To create a 412(i) plan, there must be a plan to hold the assets. The employer funds the plan by making cash contributions to the plan, and the Code allows the employer to take a tax deduction in the amount of the contributions, i.e. the entire amount.
The plan uses the contributed funds to purchase some combination of insurance products (insurance or annuities) for the plan. As the plan participants retire, the plan will usually sell the policies for their present cash value and purchase annuities with the proceeds. The revenue stream from the annuities pays the specified retirement benefit to plan participants.
In the late 1990's brokers and promoters such as Kenneth Hartstein, Dennis Cunning, and others began selling 412(i) plans designed with policies created and sold through agents of Pacific Life, Hartford, Indianapolis life, and American General. These plans were sold or administered through companies such as Economic Concepts, Inc., Pension Professionals of America, Pension Strategies, L.L.C. and others.
Lance Wallach | Business Valuations.org
ReplyDeletebusiness-valuations.org/tag/lance-wallach/
Mar 12, 2014 - New BISK CPEasy™ CPE Self-Study Course Author/Moderator: Lance Wallach, CLU, CHFC, CIMC Excerpt: Why it Makes Sense to Have a ...
FBAR/OVDI LANCE WALLACH - 412i-419 Plans - Blogger
419plans.blogspot.com/2014/.../fbarovdi-lance-wallach-fbar-offshore.ht...
Mar 12, 2014 - Visit Amazon.com's Lance Wallach Page and shop for all Lance Wallach books and other Lance Wallach related products (DVD, CDs, Apparel) ...
You +1'd this
Lance Wallach Life Insurance - 412i-419 Plans - Blogger
419plans.blogspot.com/2014/.../lance-wallach-life-insurance-complex.ht...
Mar 6, 2014 - Insurance Litigation Attorneys representing cases, ligitation support, Insurance ... life insurance coverage claims, Lance Wallach also wrote the ...
Lance Wallach +1'd this
Monday, April 29, 2013
ReplyDeleteIf You Have or Had Money Overseas You Better File for Amnesty ASAP
Lance Wallach
According to various reports the IRS is investigating the Israeli banks Bank Leumi, Bank Hapoalim and Mizrahi Tefahot Bank for conspiring with individuals to enter into a loan scheme intended to evade taxes on funds brought to the U.S. from undisclosed foreign bank accounts. The focus on the banks themselves is a notable departure from similar investigations in the past. In prior investigations, the bank or bankers had a passive relationship, whereas Bank Leumi allegedly took an active role in setting up the scheme to evade taxes. Bank Leumi has sent letters to various account holders suggesting clients enter into the IRS voluntary disclosure program otherwis
If You Have or Had Money Overseas You Better File for Amnesty ASAP
Known as the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program/Initiative (OVDP or OVDI).
To try to reduce the fines we suggest that you then opt out and take your case to the IRS appeals division. Our former IRS appeals officer has lots of experience in this. He was also a manager in the IRS international division. With large fines at stake you probably want the best.
Lance Wallach, National Society of Accountants Speaker of the Year and member of the AICPA faculty of teaching professionals, is a frequent speaker on retirement plans, abusive tax shelters, financial, international tax, and estate planning. He writes about 412(i), 419, Section79, FBAR, and captive insurance plans. He speaks at more than ten conventions annually, writes for over fifty publications, is quoted regularly in the press and has been featured on television and radio financial talk shows including NBC, National Public Radio’s All Things Considered, and others. Lance has written numerous books including Protecting Clients from Fraud, Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons, Bisk Education’s CPA’s Guide to Life Insurance and Federal Estate and Gift Taxation, as well as the AICPA best-selling books, including Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small Business Hot Spots. He does expert witness testimony and has never lost a case. Contact him at 516.938.5007, wallachinc@gmail.com or visit http://www.taxadvisorexpert.com.
The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.
Posted by Lance Wallach at 10:49 AM 2 comments:
Email This
BlogThis!
Share to Twitter
Share to Facebook
Share to Pinterest
Labels: abusive tax shelters, FBAR, IRS, Lance Wallach, Lance Wallach Expert Witness, Opt-Out, OVDI
Monday, April 15, 2013
Why the Window May Be Closing to File for Offshore Voluntary Disclosure
MONTHLY ARCHIVES: FEBRUARY 2014
ReplyDeleteWho Should Engage in Asset Protection?
FEBRUARY 24, 2014
Asset protection is a legal method of reducing your exposure to various types of risks by placing assets into various protected structures. In addition, these structures are typically organized in a manner to minimize the negative impact of a particular event. For example, did you ever wonder why both Pepsi and Coca-Cola have bottling divisions? It minimizes liability. If there is a problem with the physical product, the bottling division will be the target of litigation. However, the intellectual property is owned by a separate structure keeping out of the defendant’s chair if the bottling division is sued. However, all businesses should consider their actual structure from the perspective of being potential litigation, which is the essence of asset protection.
In general, there are two negative situations asset protection seeks to minimize. The first is bankruptcy. Here, planners work with the bankruptcy code to help clients survive bankruptcy. However, it’s important to realize there is only so much a planner can do in this area. The bankruptcy code exemptions are very clear — and also fairly limited. The second negative event planners work at minimizing is litigation. Here we have far more flexibility (so long as there are no fraudulent transfer issues). By using various structures, it is possible to greatly reduce the negative impact of litigation. Other events that are considered in the plan are divorce (both of the client and the client’s children) death (but this falls more under estate planning) and incapacitation.
It’s also important to understand what asset protection isn’t. Asset protection cannot create a bullet proof strategy that is unassailable in all situations – and don’t let anyone tell you differently. The most striking example is bankruptcy; as mentioned above, the bankruptcy exemptions are very clear and very narrow; anything that falls outside them is swept up in the bankruptcy estate to pay creditors. In addition, if a person does not maintain the plan, trouble can emerge. For example, a person that forms a corporation that does not keep up with corporate formalities could have the court “pierce the corporate veil,” meaning the person will become personally liable for the claim.
Who Should Engage in Asset Protection?
All businesses should have an attorney who specializes in asset protection look at the overall business structure at least once every few years to make sure their overall structure provides maximum protection. In addition, all high net worth individuals (people with at least $1 million in net worth) should have a plan in place, as their wealth is a natural litigation target. There are also several professions that naturally benefit from asset protection planning. Doctors lead the pack, followed closely by other licensed professionals (accountants, lawyers and engineers etc..).
Lance Wallach
68 Keswick Lane
Plainview, NY 11803
Ph.: (516)938-5007
Fax: (516)938-6330 www.vebaplan.com
National Society of Accountants Speaker of The Year
The information provided herein is not intended as legal, accounting, financial or any type of advice for any specific individual or other entity. You should contact an appropriate professional for any such advice.
Posted in Expert Witness, finance, forum, Insurance, law, legal, life insurance. Tagged business, Estate, estate planning, Fraudulent Transfer Issues, Lance Wallach, Lance Wallach Expert Witness. Edit
Lawyer 4 Audits .com
ReplyDelete"Tipping the scales of justice in
your favor."
Defending and protecting businesses and financial professionals from IRS audits,
Insurance companies and Brokerage firms.
Our Lawyers, CPAs & the Nation's Leading
Financial experts will help you deal with IRS
audits & all problems related to 419, 412i,
section 79, captive insurance & other abusive
insurance plans.
We will work to recover your losses from the stock
market & abusive insurance based plans from the
insurance companies, brokerage firms
& banks.
The following are a small sample of the professional
books our Legal & Tax Audit Experts have authored:
New & best selling American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
books & courses:
Avoiding Circular 230 Malpractice Traps and Common Abusive Small
Business Hot Spots
The Team Approach to Tax, Financial & Estate Planning
Practical Alternatives to Commonly Misused and Abused Small
Business Tax Strategies: Ensuring Your Client's Future.
Fraud... Incompetence and Scams published by John Wiley and Sons
Books by Bisk CPEasy, the nation's largest provider of Professional
education: